Free Baseline
$0
24h target
Teams validating whether an AI visibility problem exists.
- - 10 prompts
- - Gemini grounded baseline
- - Competitor and citation snapshot
- - No call required
Sample audit
Last updated: 2026-05-15
We ran our methodology on ourselves. Here's what we found.
Most audit firms show you a sanitized client report. We're showing you our own self-audit because (a) we don't share client data without explicit permission, and (b) the most honest demo of our methodology is to apply it to Oppority itself.
Spoiler: we scored zero. We're a brand-new entity with no external citations. The point of this page is what the audit shows about the gaps and what we're doing about them — the same diagnosis you'd get for your own company.
Audit baseline
0/100
Visibility score (effectively absent)
0/25
Prompts where AI named us
25
Prompts tested across Gemini grounded search
Tested on 2026-05-15. Audit category: AI search visibility / Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). Engine: Gemini 2.5 Flash with Google web grounding. Prompts sourced from category research, competitor analysis, and real buyer language patterns.
Public progress tracker (next 4 checkpoints)
We re-run this audit weekly and publish updates. This lets potential clients see whether our own strategy actually moves outcomes over time.
| Date | Checkpoint | Score | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | Baseline (published) | 0/100 | completed | Initial state. Brand not yet cited in tested prompts. |
| 2026-05-22 | Week 1 check | Pending | scheduled | Re-run after first wave of on-site updates. |
| 2026-05-29 | Week 2 check | Pending | scheduled | Expected early citation-surface ingestion window. |
| 2026-06-05 | Week 3 check | Pending | scheduled | Compare trend vs baseline and intent-level movement. |
| 2026-06-12 | Week 4 check | Pending | scheduled | First monthly comparison milestone. |
Update cadence: weekly for the first 4 checkpoints, then monthly.
Pick your depth
What you get by package
We do not publish secret implementation recipes, but we do publish scope differences so buyers can choose the right package based on depth and desired outcomes.
Deep Audit
$497
2-4 business days
Teams that need diagnosis depth and a clear execution blueprint.
- - 25 prompts
- - Sentiment + persona + negative prompts
- - 60-min strategy walkthrough
- - Prioritized execution blueprint
Guided Execution Support
$1.5K-$3.5K
scope-based
Teams that want implementation support, not just recommendations.
- - Execution on highest-leverage fixes
- - Citation-surface placements
- - Before/after follow-up cycle
- - Handoff documentation
| Capability | Free | Deep | Execution Support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompt count | 10 prompts | 25 prompts | 25 prompts + follow-up measurement cycle |
| Engines covered | Gemini grounded | Gemini + expanded capture | Guided implementation loop |
| Competitor map | Top-level view | Deeper competitor set | Competitor watch + execution updates |
| Sentiment + framing | Not included | Included | Included and tracked with follow-up |
| Persona-conditioned visibility | Not included | Included | Included and actioned in support scope |
| Negative-prompt audit | Not included | Included | Included and actioned in support scope |
| Implementation work | No | No (strategy only) | Yes (advisory/guided/done-for-you based on access) |
| Delivery format | PDF report | PDF + 60-min call + Execution Blueprint | Shipped fixes + follow-up + handoff |
Performance by buyer intent
Different prompt types reflect different buyer journeys. Here is how Oppority performed across each:
| Intent | Prompts | We appear | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| product-category | 4 | 0 (0%) | absent |
| use-case | 6 | 0 (0%) | absent |
| differentiator | 4 | 0 (0%) | absent |
| comparison | 4 | 0 (0%) | absent |
| pain-statement | 3 | 0 (0%) | absent |
| category-discovery | 1 | 0 (0%) | absent |
| industry-specific | 1 | 0 (0%) | absent |
| role-persona | 2 | 0 (0%) | absent |
Competitive landscape — who AI cites instead of us
These are the brands AI most often names when asked about our category. Profound is the most frequently mentioned competitor in the current baseline.
| Rank | Competitor | Times mentioned | Avg position when mentioned |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Profound | 8 | #2.8 |
| 2 | Ahrefs Brand Radar | 7 | #3.9 |
| 3 | SEMrush AI Toolkit | 6 | #2.2 |
| 4 | Otterly | 5 | #3.6 |
| 5 | Peec AI | 5 | #2.8 |
| 6 | Surfer SEO | 4 | #5.0 |
| 7 | Scrunch AI | 3 | #3.0 |
| 8 | Rankability | 3 | #7.0 |
Citation source map — where AI gets its answers
These are the websites Gemini actually pulled from when answering questions in our category. Earning placement on these surfaces is the highest-leverage way to be cited.
| Rank | Domain | Times cited |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tryprofound.com | 6 |
| 2 | seranking.com | 5 |
| 3 | rankability.com | 3 |
| 4 | medium.com | 3 |
| 5 | higoodie.com | 3 |
| 6 | siftly.ai | 3 |
| 7 | nightwatch.io | 2 |
| 8 | aiclicks.io | 2 |
| 9 | evertune.ai | 2 |
| 10 | surferseo.com | 2 |
Diagnosed gaps
Gap #1 — Total intent coverage absence
We are 0/N visible across every intent category tested: product-category, use-case, differentiator, comparison, pain-statement, category-discovery, industry-specific, role-persona. AI assistants do not yet associate Oppority with any of these buyer journeys, because we have not been around long enough to have built the citation pattern AI uses for category recall.
Gap #2 — Category-leader displacement
Profound is mentioned in 8 of 25 prompts at average position #2.8. They have built the pattern AI uses to recall an AI-search-visibility tool. To be recognized, we need to either earn placement on the same surfaces that surface them, or differentiate on a dimension AI values (price tier, service vs tool, methodology transparency).
Gap #3 — Citation surface absence
The most-cited domains for our category include tryprofound.com (competitor blog), seranking.com, rankability.com, evertune.ai, athenahq.ai (competitor blog), conductor.com, reddit.com, medium.com. We have content presence on none of them. This is the highest-leverage fixable gap — placing original content on these surfaces, especially comparison and methodology pieces, directly drives AI citation.
Gap #4 — Differentiator under-indexed
Our distinct positions (free-first audit, service-led model, SMB pricing, transparent methodology) do not surface in AI answers, including for prompts where they should be the obvious fit ("affordable AI search visibility tools under $200/month", "GEO consultants for SaaS companies"). The differentiation exists in the product but is not yet encoded in the citation surfaces AI reads from.
What we're doing about it
The same playbook we'd ship for any client in our shoes. Across the next 4–12 weeks — the timescale on which AI engines re-index citation surfaces:
- Structured entity signals on every page so AI engines ingest us as a recognisable category entity, not loose marketing prose.
- Comparison and methodology content targeting the buyer-intent prompts above — directly addressing the “alternatives to” and “how do I” queries that today return generic answers in our category.
- Citation-surface placements on the high-authority directories and category surfaces that the audit identified as primary AI citation sources.
- Original long-form content published where the AI engines actually look — the surfaces that show up repeatedly in citation maps for our category.
- Genuinely helpful community engagement in places real buyers research before purchase.
- Re-audit on a fixed monthly cadence on the same prompt set. Public results. Either the work moves the needle and we publish that, or it does not and we publish that too.
We're publishing the categories of work we're doing — not the specific surfaces or sequencing — because the value of an Oppority engagement is in the execution and the prioritisation, not in the abstract list of things to consider.
Want this kind of audit for your own brand?
Submit your domain at oppority.com/check. Within 24 hours you receive the same structured audit shown on this page, run on your category and your competitors. Free.
Get the free baseline